Reviewer Login
Share Page
Reviews

I came across an interesting article a while back in the old favorite 'Hifi News', a UK publication that I started reading way back in time. I've been experimenting some with high res downloads in various sampling rates and formats, and the article in HFN basically tells me that in a lot of cases the files were never truly high resolution to begin with. I kicked the notion around for a while then yesterday came across this website itrax.com and low and behold there's an article written by the owner of itrax, a Mr. Mark Waldrep, Ph.D. who makes reference to the original article in HFN. First off, iTrax are a high resolution audio download company, much like HD Tracks who I reviewed here, but supposedly offering an enhanced version of the standard hi-res audio file (audiophile?) which is truly high definition.
Mr. Waldrep has an interesting report on the HFN article which supports all of the facts reported by HFN and claims that the state of the high res download industry is...well, it's basically a debacle.
To paraphrase one of the claims within the report - Audiophiles buying hi-res music downloads do it blindly on trust. But so called premium 24-bit/88.2, 24/96, 24/176.4 of 24/192 files do not always (in fact, most commonly) deliver the expected bandwidth enhancements in a way which transposes to superior sound quality.
The report goes on to mention certain culprits and in doing so a couple of high-profile companies are brought into the spotlight, namely Chesky and Linn.

HD Tracks, a company I've used to purchase most of my own high def / hi-res downloads seem to be acting quite transparently by re labeling tracks purported to be high-res with the actual bandwidth and bitrates measured.

So I look forward to iTrax developing their catalog of high def downloads and for the existing players in the industry becoming more open about the resolution of the music they offer.
Meanwhile if you have any information on this subject I'd appreciate hearing from you, just drop me a line through the website.

CH

 
User Rating: / 7
PoorBest 

Navison Audio Review
I was quite intrigued at the prospect of spending some time with a high-end pre and power amp combination carrying the label “Made in Vietnam”. It isn’t unusual these days to see China as the country of origin, but so far this is my first encounter with a product from this part of the Indochinese Peninsula.
The Vietnam War destroyed much of the economy of Vietnam and it took many post-war years to pass before sufficient political and economic reforms enabled the re-establishment of friendly trading relations with the US and much of Europe. With the lifting of post-war embargoes Vietnam’s manufacturing base has grown rapidly, as has its economy. Given our history, I guess it’s something of a miracle of globalization to see Vietnamese products in North American homes.

Navison Audio has been around as a manufacturing supplier to the Asian market since 2003 and functioned as a design company for three years prior to that.
Navison have recently launched their product line into the US, with pricing at a point that competes squarely with the likes of Conrad Johnson, Audio Research and Cary Audio.
With a small support team based in San Jose CA, Navison Audio can provide local sales and service to the US market, while retaining the cost advantage of a manufacturing base in Vietnam.

Ben Nguyen is President-CEO of Navison Audio and is the main contact at the San Jose office for all things sales or technical. Talking with Ben I gained the impression that his company is very committed to their presence in the US. This isn't a 'toe in the water' venture to look for possible market openings; it's a full-blooded assault on the high-end market. There are dozens of amp manufacturers around today whose offerings seem to be more of a market 'probe' than the finished article - poor cosmetics, unreliable circuits, difficult to source components, etc. The two Navison products that I've been fortunate enough to have in my possession have exhibited the kind of attention to detail, evident in their aesthetic and ergonomic refinement and manufacturing fit and finish, that one would expect only from the elite few manufacturers.

Navison Audio SE-MK II Preamp
Navison's top of the line preamp ($4900) is a vacuum tube based, microprocessor controlled linestage, with an impressive array of user-friendly features. For two-channel functionality it is similar to my Aesthetix Calypso Linestage, offering stand-by, mute, source, volume, balance and phase control, all without having to leave the comfort of your couch. Instead of the generic, tacky, plastic remote that comes with the Aesthetix gear, the Navison has a very handsome brushed aluminum remote with a very solid and “chunky” feel to it. The unit isn't HT-friendly as evidenced by its omission of any pass-through or sub-out connections. The SE-MKII has the bare minimum of connectivity one might require, with RCA inputs for three sources and two pairs of RCA outputs.

This preamp is simply a delight to behold. From the moment I released the unit from its packaging I was taken with its attractive appearance and solid feel.
The front-panel of the unit is a blend of hi-tech and traditional styling. A brushed aluminum panel houses LED indicators and push-button controls, the latter having a solid and tactile feel. The user-interface is flanked either side by very attractive Barian Kingwood panels.
At 35 LBS and 15.68D x 21.84W x 4.15H inches, this preamp is quite a handful to place and position atop the equipment rack, even for a brute like myself. It isn't the weight necessarily that makes it a little difficult to maneuver, but the physical size of the unit. This leads to one minor drawback, one that I believe to be a small miscalculation on behalf of the designers; it doesn't fit into a standard equipment rack opening and thus requires a place on the very top shelf in most racks. Spinning this differently, the top shelf is really where this unit deserves to be.
Navison recommend connecting their preamp to power amplifiers with an input impedance of 20k ohms or higher and remind owners via the comprehensive user manual that the preamp is phase-inverting.
An impressive resume of internal components prepares the listener for some of what's to come, not least of which are the venerable Jensen and Mundorf caps, and Riken resistors. At the heart of the unit The SE-MKII circuit employs eight vacuum tubes, all 6H1-EB's, which the manual claims offer low noise and low microphonics. With the SE-MKII connected to my Cary 2A3SE mono's the system exhibited just a hint of tube hiss, just barely audible at the listening seat and insufficient to create any real nuisance factor. My speakers are horn-loaded and rated around 106db, so are highly revealing of any component noise whatsoever.
Navison, much like Cary and several other tube amp manufacturers, recommend that you source replacement tubes directly from their service office, and back-up their tube selection with the claim of an anticipated two to three years of tube-life, if the unit is used in “normal” operation. By normal Navison intend that you switch the power button off, placing the unit into standby mode after each listening session.

Sound Quality
From cold, and it was cold, the unit being delivered to my Wisconsin location in April, the SE-MKII seemed to have a little too much tube bloom and midrange warmth. A little over-cooked as it were. Naturally one shouldn't listen too critically to any component that hasn't had time to fully warm-up, but let's face it; can anyone resist the temptation of taking a sneak preview of a new component as soon as it's been plugged in?
After 4 hours of warm-up (the unit was a well-traveled review sample, hence fully broken-in) the SE-MKII sounded, well, quite glorious in fact.
Gone was the layer of excessive warmth and in its place a wonderfully full-bodied and articulate presentation. This certainly isn’t a tube amp voiced to sound like solid-state. It has all the character of a tubed component and makes no attempt to hide its vacuum-tubed virtues.
But is it possible to have too much of a good thing going on with tubes? – After a week or so I decided to try and ascertain the true signature of the SE MKII by pulling the preamp and running source-direct into the Cary power amps. My Capitole MKII player has volume control in the analog domain and is a very worthy contender for a high-end preamp in its own right. With the Navison removed from the chain, the effect was similar to that of pulling the Calypso – the sound quality deteriorated. Some would argue that a source-direct route has to be optimal, since we’re removing a whole chunk of active circuitry from the signal path, circuits that must be imparting some undesirable artifacts on the sound. But as I discovered with the Calypso, the Navison provides a safe and unmolested passage for the signal. Its presence in the signal path provides the listener with a more lively and enhanced sense of dynamic contrast, versus the more laid-back and less involving sound of running source-direct. With the Capitole driving the Cary’s direct, there was a distinct loss of dynamic agility and also weight and body to the individual notes. Not just a leaner presentation but a more laid-back and less involving presentation running source-direct. Cynics would argue then that the Navison (and Aesthetix) must therefore be “adding something”, which would of course be breaking the golden rule of high-end audio. I prefer to think of it this way; using a good active linestage may help to prevent the removal of information in the audio signal, rather than add to it. I believe this preventative function is achieved by the active circuitry of the preamp providing a more sympathetic matching of output and input impedances/gains between the source and the power amp – a better electrical match.

So what is the signature of the SE MKII? To offer some comparative perspectives to the reader; before hearing the Navison I had always considered the Aesthetix Calypso to provide a near perfect balance of preamp attributes; detailed and transparent yet with the harmonic richness one expects from tubes. I like to slice my pie just on the warm side of neutral so long as I don't feel robbed of the subtle detail that might be obfuscated by an overly warm tonal balance. There’s undoubtedly a conflict between having a warm, full-bodied presentation and one that allows you to hear the subtleties residing in the deeper layers of the musical event. Where I thought the Aesthetix achieved the right balance of warmth and detail, the Navison takes the warmth versus detail dichotomy and resolves it dead on – at least for my personal tastes.

So, is it possible to have a fleshed-out, scarily palpable image of Johnny Cash singing “Delia” in your room, followed by an uncanny unraveling of the micro detail in the plucking style of the late Michael Hedges? With the Navison SE-MKII preamp it is.
But what about all the other audiophile measurables like frequency response, transparency, soundstage, imaging? Well, the Navison concedes just a tad to the Calypso in soundstage width. Where the Calypso releases the sound more freely from the outer speaker boundaries, the SE-MKII hangs on to it just a little. This affects perceived transparency a tad also, with the Aesthetix perhaps attaining a 9, versus the Navison’s 8.5 out of 10. The Navison presentation is slightly forward of the speaker plane in comparison to the Aesthetix Calypso, the latter offering a slightly enhanced illusion of stage depth as a consequence of its more recessed presentation. The Aesthetix has a touch more energy at the top of the frequency spectrum, providing slightly more air and sparkle, where the Navison is just a little darker by comparison. With this slight top-end reticence one might expect a slight loss of image focus and definition to follow, but that is certainly not the case here. Imaging is first rate; solid, focused, palpable, without sounding artificially etched into space.
Bass from the Navison preamp is tuneful and extended with good pitch definition. I wouldn’t use the word “taught”, at least not in the sense we’ve come to expect from solid-state amplification, but it hangs together well and doesn’t tip toward excessive ripeness as many tube-based components often do.
A couple weeks into my time with the SE-MKII I took delivery of a pair of Acoustic Zen Silver Reference II interconnects. The idea was to switch out the HT ProSilway III hybrid, in favor of the full silver cable, to see if a little more could be extracted from the higher frequencies. With the AZ Silver Ref's in place between source and pre, the higher frequencies opened up a little. Gone was any sense that ambient cues were being curtailed and the presentation of higher frequencies stepped more towards the extension and air of the Aesthetix. Yet oddly enough the amplitude of the lower frequencies seemed to reduce noticeably, requiring some adjustment to the bass crossover. The point being, as with any highly resolving component, cable choices can certainly have a significant impact on the overall presentation.

The above are merely observations on single elements of the sound of this preamp and should not be construed as anything meaningful or definitive when taken in isolation. The whole point of a quality component is to deliver the heart and soul of music, and the Navison Audio SE-MKII preamp excels at reproducing music across the entire musical spectrum with its heart and soul intact.
Where some preamp designs seem to go all-out in favor of excelling in one particular area, the SE-MKII seems to get it right across the board. Dynamic and detailed, yet able to deliver these attributes with the perfect amount of “flesh on bones” - you won't hear a stripped-down skeletal version of the musical event with the Navison.

Enter the NVS 572 Monoblocks. ($6900 pair)
Just when I thought it was safe to answer the door again, the FedEx driver rolled up with another two large crates.
Just like the SE-MKII preamp, the 572 amps were impeccably packaged, double-boxed in sturdy shipping cartons offering damage resistance of a standard to frustrate even UPS on a good day. (UPS mantra - if we can't loose 'em, drop 'em).
Fit and finish of the 572 is superb, with the same matching exotic wood trim as the SE-MKII, this time with the added embellishment of engraved lettering deep into the face of the dark wood surface.
Removing the first amp from its carton, I prepared myself for the weight to be distributed more under the transformer cans, thus requiring a front to back grip and not side to side. Surprisingly, the weight, an ample but not excessive 33LBS, was fairly evenly distributed front to back. A quick rap on the transformer cans produced a fairly hollow sound, confirming my suspicion that the extremely large cans are merely cosmetic covers for much smaller transformers.
Setup of the 572 amps was a breeze, they replaced my Cary 2A3's, also monoblocks, so no re-cabling was necessary. Sitting on AudioPoints spiked into extremely heavy Target R3 stands, in turn spiked into the floor via more AudioPoints, the amps looked very classy flanking their SE-MKII sibling.

The NVS 572 is a single-ended Class A Triode, pushing out a useful 15 Watts per channel from a single 572 Svetlana tube, developed from the 811 class of transmitter tubes renowned for their excellent linearity.
Key performance parameters taken from the Navison website: input sensitivity is rated at 2.5 Volt for full output, input Impedance is 100 K Ohms, frequency Response 15 Hz to 20 KHz, and hum/noise specified at -75 dB below full output.

Sound Quality
I haven't rolled many power amps through my system of late. The most recent to take the place of my little Cary 5 watter's for a while was a pair of push-pull Jadis JA30 mono's. The Jadis gear gave me a flavor of what a high-powered push-pull design could accomplish in a 106db system, which on paper at least doesn't require more than the little Cary's have to offer. The Jadis brought to the party two notable elements, both of which the Cary's lacked; upper bass/lower midrange impact - and tube noise.
The NVS 572's were quiet in my system, but like their stable-mate the SE-MKII preamp, they were not dead quiet. With the 572/MKII combo there was audible tube noise at the listening seat, more so than with the Calypso/Cary combo, but much less so than with the Calypso/Jadis combo. One of the advantages of a basement listening room, at least in my situation, is the absence of any distracting ambient noise - no refrigerators, furnaces, neighbors etc, so the slight tube-rush was a little disconcerting at first. Given more time or the potential of future ownership, I might have dabbled with PC’s or earthing arrangements to try to abate the unwanted background hiss, but it wasn’t really distracting to the point of driving me to such measures.

So how did the 572 amps sound in my system?
These power amps are certainly cut from the same sonic cloth as the SE-MKII pre. Their focus is to connect the listener directly with the music and to avoid shifting any emphasis onto the sound of the equipment. Dynamic, bold, full-bodied and detailed, are terms that best describe the sound of the 572's in my system. Again, as with the MKII preamp, Navison seems to have mastered the art of blending detail with a tonally warm and harmonically rich presentation.
Initially I had the notion that perhaps the combo tipped the balance a little too much towards the warm side of things. The simple acid test for determining if a component has crossed the line from having a harmonically rich and naturally warm presentation, into a place that might be described as “syrupy” or bloated, is to play a few cuts of more complex music. The wonderful recording of Bach's Passion on the Decca Label (sub-titled The Passion Of Christ As You've Never Heard It Before) took its turn in my CD player. I'm not generally a fan of choral works, but highlights from St. Matthew Passion featuring the Chicago Symphony Chorus invariably seem to find their way into any critical evaluation session of late. Listening for any loss of separation where performers blend together and lose their individual space, I can honestly say that the Navison combination never crossed the line into excessive midrange bloom; in fact it walked the line better than any other pre/power amplifier combo I have heard in a long while.

The extra power from the 572 (15 watts, compared to the Cary's 5) certainly delivered more dynamic contrast and visceral impact; quite startling on certain percussive oriented tracks. The excellent ECM recording of Manu Katche's “Neighborhood” sparkled with energy, the bite and attack of Katche's stick-work popping out from the soundstage with lifelike impact and presence. The enhanced sense of dynamics and nicely focused image placement created a more dramatic dimension to the presentation than could ever be solicited from the 5 watt Cary's.
The extra drive from the 572's also paid dividends when watching concert DVD's on the large screen. When forced to play cuts from the Godsmack “Changes” DVD, by people much younger than myself, I was quite taken with the systems' ability to create a soundfield that enveloped the listener and pressurized the room with sound level peaks measured in excess of 106 db, without any hint of compression or strain.
On the excellent “David Gilmour in Concert” DVD, the Navison combo captured the acoustic space and delivered the event with a degree of palpability and presence that I haven't heard from my system before. More complex tracks from this DVD, such as the Division Bell cut “High Hopes”, retained the individual space of instruments on the stage, layered-in the backing vocalists with sufficient depth, and relayed the liveliness of the acoustic space without any discernable additions or omissions. With the volume set quite high, the stage never showed any sign of reducing in scale or becoming homogenized as the track evolves into its instrumental crescendo.
In the interests of fairness I must draw readers to the fact that my horn towers, as driven by the 572's, run only down to around 150hz, with bass duties picked up by a dedicated bass amp from 150hz and lower. So while I am able to assess the bass performance of the preamp, I can't comment specifically on what the NVS 572 is able to accomplish in the nether regions.

Conclusion
The Navison Audio NVS 572 and SE-MKII preamp are top-class components designed to provide complete musical satisfaction ahead of all else. Where some components thrust detail in your face in a way that draws attention to the equipment, the Navison allows you to bask in the glory of the music without distraction. Their harmonic richness and inner light, the kind that can only come from tubes, creates a perfectly illuminated portrait of the event and at the same time presents music with true to life presence and impact.
There's another aspect of the Navison equipment, even more subjective than the above, but worth mentioning anyway - pride of ownership. The equipment is so well built, so stunning to look at, and so ergonomically friendly, that you just want to place it in the most prominent position in your equipment rack and admire it.

Who should consider seeking out an audition of Navison Audio products? Well, I can still envisage the person who thinks home audio equipment is no different than studio equipment, and is merely a tool to help analyze the individual notes of a performance rather than a medium for transporting you to a musical event. I’ve met this person so I know he exists and he isn't worthy of Navison Audio ownership. Anyone who’s in it for the music and not just the gear (and it’s ok to dig both) should check out the NVS 572 power amps and the SE-MKII preamp. If I were in the market for making a $12,000 addition to my system I would be quite comfortable making an investment in Navison Audio, one that I’m quite certain would provide me with the highest level of musical satisfaction for years to come.

This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Last Updated (Wednesday, 10 March 2010 14:55)

 
User Rating: / 6
PoorBest 

The following is a series of reviews I wrote about my new Odyssey Stratos Mono Extremes.

Well I Got the amps yesterday. No problems with UPS. They were well packaged, double boxed. I purchased them off Audiogon from Underwoodwally. So I eagerly unpacked them and hooked them up. I couldn't wait for them to come up to room temp(I live in WI, very cool yesterday). Anyway cool as they were they sounded excellent. They replaced a set of 160 watt pure class A tubed monos. They sure hold their own against them on first listening. They main thing I always notice that SS amps lack when compared to tubes is a lack of texture.
Later in the evening when they came up to temp(which isn't much to the touch) I put on Rickie Lee Jones Naked Songs. A real torture disk. I've  found it to be harsh on many systems including tubes especially on underpowered amps. Too much volume can send you scurrying for the volume fast. No such problems with the Odyssey amps. These are just my first impressions. It usually takes me several weeks to really tell the differences between gear.The Odyssey amps have lots of drive and rhythm. Great dynamics. Great bass control as well as depth.
They will be with me a very long time. I'm not a flavor of the month clubber. Most of my gear I've had for many years(much to my wife chagrin).
I should say I'm using them to drive a pair of Hales Concept 5 speakers. I'm also using a tubed pre, transport and SS dac.
More as I listen.

I've spent a fair amount of time listening now. The amps have been powered up constantly since Friday so everything should be fully charged. I was listening last night to Lyle Lovet's Joshua, Judges, Ruth. I'm sitting there listening to a few cuts and the music/system isn't doing much for me. Is it me, my mood, or the system. After the first two songs I turned up the volume. Ah, that's better. Turned it up some more. Still better. One more click on the preamp and things come alive. The Hales are inefficient speakers after all. Boy, do these amps clamp down on these speakers. Sound stage is truly wall to wall and deep. Front to back layering is very good, better than my big tube amps. Image separation is excellent but lacking air around the image. Bass is deep and tight. As I said I was listening very loud but the treble never became harsh or etched. The biggest thing I feel I'm missing is air around the images especially the main vocalist. More later as I get more time with these amps. They are truly great sounding

I've had the amps on since I got em and I play music through them all day. I did notice a marked improvement last night. A few things I forgot to mention in my lame reviews were how good they do do attack. Especially on drum. The whack of the note is very satisfying. Also stirred snare and cymbals sound great. Last night the deep bass really started to come around. Much better rhythm and drive to the music. I'll keep listening.

Ok, I had the amps for a little over a week now, playing them all day every day. They are used so they should be broken in and now fully charged up. I took the junk stock tubes out of my pre and replaced them with Telefunken's. All I can say is wow. What a difference. Now the amps portray a fuller richer sound. Bass is deeper but softer, more like what I hear in live bass. There is a definite darkening to the sound which is how I like it. I've never been much on high frequency extremes. I much prefer a big round, rich midrange and bottom end. That doesn't mean I don't need a system that has good resolving ability. Guitars on John Platania Blues, Waltzes, and Badland Borders are now big and fat. On Greg Brown's Yellow Dog his voice is nice and chesty and deep. I just heard him and Bo Ramsey last Sat. night at a small club and this is how his voice sounded. On Cowboy Junkies At The End of Paths Taken Michaels guitar again is fat and swirling. Margo's voice is absolutely beautiful and airy. Pete's cymbals still have the same shimmer to them that I noticed when I first listened to these amps.
Everything I liked at first is still good but the things that bothered me are now almost all corrected. I could use more air around instruments.
All in all I am very happy with these amps. They will be with me for a long time. I just wonder what taking them to the SE level would do?

Again I'm no reviewer so please excuse my poor writing style but I think you get the idea, I like these amps.

Clive

 
User Rating: / 2
PoorBest 

Walker Audio SST (Super Silver Treatment) contact Enhancer


Or, another one of doc's premature enunciations.

First Enuncement: The preliminary review of the Mapleshade SilClear will have to suffice. . .'cause I've just tried the Walker SST treatment and there's no goin' back!

Second Enuncement: Everything you've read about this product is true. It's AMAZing! Not wanting to commit another one of "doc's immaculate misconceptions," I started out by cleaning and treating only my digital Poiema!! cable. Since it takes up to 8 hours to fully break in, I intend to take it one cable at a time, this way if there is such thing as too much of a good thing, I can back off and leave well enough alone.

Immediate improvements are an expansion of the harmonic content of the music. Now I can HEAR the complex overtones on Michael Hedges' guitar, and their decay. This alone adds a richness to the music that tickles the eardrums. As a result, everything begins to sound more "you are there" alive.  

And most importantly, unlike the SilClear (at least in my system, YMMV), the SST treatment appears to have absolutely no negative effects whatsoever.  

I realize this posting may be a bit premature, having only treated a single cable, but if these improvements are additive, I can't even image what the system will sound like next week! And this is only their Super version of the product. They have an Extreme version which sells for twice the price ($150) and is said to provide and additional 20-30% improvement over the SST.

I got mine through Music Direct in Chicago. They bundle it with an excellent Caig A/V Survival Kit ($40 value), which gives you everything you need to clean and treat your cables before you apply the SST. You get both for $100, plus shipping.  

$100 might sound pricey for just half an ounce of SST, but trust me, you need such a small amount to treat each cable that this one jar will last me for YEARS!

Stay tuned to this channel for future "immaculate" enunciations, or is that an Assumption?

Doc

 

Blue Circle BC 86 AC Line Conditioner - Noise Hound

I bought a pair of Blue Circle BC 86 'Noise Hounds' from Kevin Allen of www.harmonia-audio.com in Canada a couple of weeks before the holiday.

The Noise Hound is a small blue box with a fitted power cord that plugs into any unused power outlet on your system circuit. They provide mains filtering of the typical noise and hash that resides in any AC installation.
The filtering affect is said to be cumulative, so using two or more units may offer more benefit than one. These units are around $100 a piece with free shipping into the US, so they fall firmly into the 'tweak' category, at least as far as pricing is concerned.
When the pair arrived, I plugged one of them into the same circuit that runs the system, and one into a spare outlet on another circuit. My first impression was that the whole soundstage was shoved backwards, and there was a 'thinning of the sound, which wasn't really attractive. So I unplugged the unit from my system circuit and moved it to another circuit and left it for a few days.

After one week I plugged one of the Noise Hounds back into an outlet on my system circuit, and listened for 20 minutes or so. I did not experience any of the adverse effects present the first time around, so clearly, these need some break-in time, preferably away from the system.
In the 20 or so minutes that I had available for listening, I couldn't detect anything significant, there was maybe a hint of extra clarity in the midrange with the single hound, but it was a strain to hear anything significant.

A few days later I plugged the second Noise Hound directly into my PS600 power plant, so I now had both units in the system, one in an unused outlet and the other plugged directly into my power conditioner.
On settling in for a quick flick through my Ry Cooder/Ali Farka Toure 'Talking Timbuktu' CD, it was immediately apparent that there was a significant change to the sound.
There was a clarity in the soundstage that I knew the system was capable of. The bass sounds cleaner and tighter and the midrange is improved at least 70% or more from pre Noise Hound days. The noise floor is reduced noticeably and sounds are coming from a much blacker background than before. Imaging is much tighter and there is more air around instruments and performers. The whole sound just gels together and sounds much more dynamic and at the same time more musical.
There are other improvements that I'm hearing on a daily basis, this is an across the board benefit to my system that performs way beyond the $200 price point of the pair of Noise Hounds.

I should also add that we live well out of town, and I'd always thought the AC supply to be cleaner where I live now, than in a more urban setting. I've had very little benefit from dedicated lines and aftermarket power cords, so I just figured the AC is pretty clean to start with and the benefits of improved power components were always going to be more subtle.....wrong. There is nothing subtle about what the Noise Hounds are doing in my system.
What is also interesting is the fact that they work so well actually plugged into a power conditioner. I haven't tried both units in the power conditioner yet, but may do that on the coming weekend.
I highly recommend trying these units if you have a power conditioner, particularly the PS Audio units.

I can't say that everyone would benefit from two Hounds, but for an extra $100 it has to be worth a try. It's all system dependant, but in my system these have been a revelation. Very highly recommended 'components' that perform well beyond any 'tweak' that I've ever tried.


by Rooze on 12-16-04

 
More Articles...
Search
Survey
What is your most used source?
 
Our Newsletter!
Who's Here
We have 16 guests online
Bookmark Feed
Bookmark Page